Combustion 2008
  Background
  In recent years, because attention has been concentrated on 
  non-reacting flows, it must be admitted that the development of 
  combustion modelling in PHOENICS has stagnated. Specifically:
  
  - The Simple Chemically Reacting system has continued to be used, 
  but still with the restriction to a single fuel-supply stream.
  
  
 - Temperatures have continued to be calculated by way of enthalpy, 
  which has conflicted with the direct solution for TEM1 that is 
  preferred for problems involving conjugate heat transfer (i.e. 
  interaction with heat conduction in neighbouring solids).
  
  
 - The Extended SCRS has been little used because of its limitations 
  and complexity.
  
 
  Recently however attention to the problem are has been renewed, with 
  the results that:
  
multiple fuel-supply streams can be handled; 
  solution for enthalpy  can be abandoned; and
  direct  solution for temperature (i.e. TEM1 ) can be 
  recommended for all circumstances.
  
  These developments involve:
  
  - replacing the MIXF (i.e. mixture fraction ) variable by 
  MIX1, MIX2, MIX3 etcetera which represent the mass fractions of 
  material introduced by the first, second, third etcetera 
  fuel-supplying streams;
  
 -  introducing the concept of the adiabatic-flow temperature, 
  T1AD, 
  which is the temperature which would prevail if heat transfer to the 
  solids surrounding the flowing gases were absent;
  
 -  recognising that the solved-for TEM1 variable, which has no 
  chemical-reaction-related sources, represents the deviation of the 
  actual temperature T1 from the adiabatic temperature, thus:
  T1 = T1AD + TEM1; and
   - recognising that the enthalpy continues to have value as an 
  auxiliary variable, but only as stored, not solved-for.
  
 
  
  The extreme scenarios distinguished
  In order to simplify the simulation process where possible, it is 
  useful to distinguish the following extreme scenarios:
  
  -  Adiabatic; mixed-is-burned; one fuel-bearing stream
  
 -  Adiabatic; mixed-is-burned; several fuel-bearing streams
  
 -  Adiabatic; mixed-is-burned; several different-fuel-bearing streams
  
 -  Non-adiabatic; mixed-is-burned; one fuel-bearing stream
  
 -  Non-adiabatic; mixed-is-burned; several fuel-bearing streams
  
 -  Non-adiabatic; mixed-is-burned; several different-fuel-bearing streams
  
 -  Adiabatic; finite reaction rate; one fuel-bearing stream
  
 -  Adiabatic; finite reaction rate; several fuel-bearing stream
  
 -  Adiabatic; finite reaction rate; several different-fuel-bearing stream
  
 
  These scenarios will be discussed individually, one-by-one.
  a. Adiabatic; mixed-is-burned; one fuel-bearing stream
  The solved-for variable which is relevant to combustion is MIXF, the 
  mass fraction of material emanating from the fuel-bearing in-flow 
  stream, whatever its state of chemical aggregation.
  Variables which it may be useful to store but not solve include:
  
  -  the enthalpy H1,
  
 -  the temperature T1,
  
 -  the unburned fuel mass fraction FU,
  
 -  the unburned oxygen mass fraction O2,
  
 -  the product-of-combustion mass fraction PROD
  
 -  If the fuel mass fraction of that stream is fuin, 
  
 
  Relevant material constants are:
  
  - The stoichiometric ratio (= bass of oxygen needed to burn unit 
  mass of fuel), fst. 
  
   b. Adiabatic; mixed-is-burned; several fuel-bearing streams
   c, Adiabatic; mixed-is-burned; several different-fuel-bearing streams
   d, Non-adiabatic; mixed-is-burned; one fuel-bearing stream
   e. Non-adiabatic; mixed-is-burned; several fuel-bearing streams
   f. Non-adiabatic; mixed-is-burned; several different-fuel-bearing streams
   g. Adiabatic; finite reaction rate; one fuel-bearing stream
   h, Adiabatic; finite reaction rate; several fuel-bearing stream
   i. Adiabatic; finite reaction rate; several different-fuel-bearing stream